(Leave this as-is, it’s a trap!)

To delete this post you must be either the original author or a designated moderator.
The content of the post will be removed but the name and date will remain.

  • The post will be removed completely from the thread, rather than blanked
  • Only posts on the last page of the thread can be removed completely (so as to not break permalinks)

RE[7]: I'd like to help!


I was going to ask, can we use the existing cc65, or do we need a special build?

The CPU support is in ca65, and you can still use cc65 in c64 mode without problems, but if for using c65/mega65 features you'll need to expand cc65. If you want to go this way, I suggest starting with a C65 mode, that will enable running binaries from C65 BASIC. If that one works, you'll can think about expanding the compiler itself to use the new 65ce02/4502/4510 instructions.

From my experience with implementing the 4510 support in ca65, I can tell you that you should support the C65 as the primary target instead of the MEGA65.

I've managed to get my MEGA65 to boot, though I couldn't figure out how to mount disk images, but didn't really have the time to dig in.

GO 64

As for the toolchain to use: if you're writing assembler there has been some effort on several assemblers to include the 4502/10 instruction set: 64tass, acme, ca65 are all decent assemblers supporting all instructions of the CPU, Orphis also does, but that's a pain in the a** from the users point of view.

Your friendly neighbourhood moderators: Deft, gardners, MARCOM